Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Semab Tariq <semab(dot)tariq(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, CM Team <cm(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data
Date: 2021-11-10 03:53:41
Message-ID: 20211110035341.GC968057@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:55:13AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 3:40 AM Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > $ diff -U0 <(cut -b47- disasm/70bef49/equalTupleDescs) <(cut -b47- disasm/166f943/equalTupleDescs)
> > --- /dev/fd/63 2021-11-09 06:11:20.927444437 -0800
> > +++ /dev/fd/62 2021-11-09 06:11:20.926444428 -0800
> > @@ -100 +100 @@
> > - br.call.sptk.many rp=0x40000000003cdc20
> > + br.call.sptk.many rp=0x40000000003cde20
> > @@ -658 +658 @@
> > - br.call.sptk.many rp=0x40000000003cdc20
> > + br.call.sptk.many rp=0x40000000003cde20
> > @@ -817 +817 @@
> > - br.call.sptk.many rp=0x3fffffffff3fdc30
> > + br.call.sptk.many rp=0x4000000000400c30
> > @@ -949 +949 @@
> > - br.call.sptk.many rp=0x40000000003cdc20
> > + br.call.sptk.many rp=0x40000000003cde20
> > @@ -970 +970 @@
> > - br.call.sptk.many rp=0x40000000003cdc20
> > + br.call.sptk.many rp=0x40000000003cde20
> >
> > Since "git diff 70bef49 166f943" contains nothing that correlates with such a
> > change, I'm concluding that this is a bug in gharial's toolchain.
>
> Excellent detective work.

Thanks.

> > It looks like gharial's automatic buildfarm runs have been paused for nine
> > days. Feel free to unpause it. Also, I recommend using the buildfarm client
> > setnotes.pl to add a note like 'Rare signal 11 from toolchain bug'. Months or
> > years pass between these events. Here are all gharial "signal 11" failures,
> > likely some of which have other causes:
>
> Yeah I spent time investigating some of these at the time and I know
> others did too.
>
> IMHO we should hunt down dead toolchains and gently see if we can get
> them updated. There is no point in testing PostgreSQL on every
> commit on a compiler someone built from a tarball many years ago and
> never updated with bug fixes.

+1 for "gently see if". It's good that we have a few old-gcc animals, but
having versions of intermediate age is less important. Some owners will
decline, and that's okay.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2021-11-10 04:15:41 Re: conchuela timeouts since 2021-10-09 system upgrade
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-11-10 03:07:02 Re: BUG #17255: Server crashes in index_delete_sort_cmp() due to race condition with vacuum