| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Sasasu <i(at)sasa(dot)su>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: XTS cipher mode for cluster file encryption |
| Date: | 2021-11-02 21:49:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20211102214903.GA17209@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 02:24:36PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I can understand the general idea that we should be sure to engineer
> this in a way that multiple methods can be used, as surely one day folks
> will say that AES128 isn't acceptable any more. In terms of what we'll
> do from the start, I would think providing the options of AES128 and
> AES256 would be good to ensure that we have the bits covered to support
> multiple methods and I don't think that would put us into a situation of
My patch supports AES128, AES192, and AES256.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-11-02 21:59:49 | Re: enabling FOO=bar arguments to vcregress.pl |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-11-02 21:39:51 | Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box? |