Re: parallelizing the archiver

Greetings,

* Bossart, Nathan (bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com) wrote:
> On 10/25/21, 1:41 PM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> > Great. Unless I see additional feedback on the basic design shortly,
> > I'll give the documentation updates a try.
>
> Okay, here is a more complete patch with a first attempt at the
> documentation changes. I tried to keep the changes to the existing
> docs as minimal as possible, and then I added a new chapter that
> describes what goes into creating an archive module. Separately, I
> simplified the basic_archive module, moved it to src/test/modules,
> and added a simple test. My goal is for this to serve as a basic
> example and to provide some test coverage on the new infrastructure.

Definitely interested and plan to look at this more shortly, and
generally this all sounds good, but maybe we should have it be posted
under a new thread as it's moved pretty far from the subject and folks
might not appreciate what this is about at this point..?

Thanks,

Stephen