| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Kamigishi Rei <iijima(dot)yun(at)koumakan(dot)jp>, David Rowley <dgrowley(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17245: Index corruption involving deduplicated entries |
| Date: | 2021-10-28 21:36:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20211028213612.vv2q4rcd5lcosubv@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On 2021-10-28 14:18:32 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Note that the other people that had similar complaints about Postgres 14 all
> used foreign keys on affected tables.
Do you have links to the other reports?
> * The transaction ID 365637 is very over-represented, appearing in
> several corrupt heap tuple headers, located across several heap pages.
>
> * Its "neighbor" transaction ID is 365638, which appears once more. To
> me this suggests some kind of confusion with an OldestXmin style
> cutoff during VACUUM.
I'm not quite following this bit, could you expand on that?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-10-28 21:39:37 | Re: BUG #17245: Index corruption involving deduplicated entries |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-10-28 21:31:03 | Re: BUG #17245: Index corruption involving deduplicated entries |