Re: pg_receivewal starting position

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io
Cc: bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal starting position
Date: 2021-10-27 02:20:08
Message-ID: 20211027.112008.911000402208035089.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:17:28 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> Each pg_receivewal run stalls for about 10 or more seconds before
> finishing, which is not great from the standpoint of recently
> increasing test run time.
>
> Maybe we want to advance LSN a bit, after taking $nextlsn then pass
> "-s 1" to pg_receivewal.

Hmm. Sorry, my fingers slipped. We don't need '-s 1' for this purpose.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-10-27 02:53:09 Re: Setting log_connection in connection string doesn't work
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-10-27 02:17:28 Re: pg_receivewal starting position