Re: ldap/t/001_auth.pl fails with openldap 2.5

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <tmunro(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ldap/t/001_auth.pl fails with openldap 2.5
Date: 2021-10-19 18:20:16
Message-ID: 20211019182016.aa6kjrenfk4jkxlg@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2021-10-10 00:45:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Although I'm mildly tempted to rewrap the parameters, it's kinda odd how the
> > trailing parameter on one line, has its value on the next line.
>
> I'm betting that perltidy did that. If you want to fix it so it
> stays fixed, maybe reordering the parameters could help.

You were right on that front. Since perltidy insisted on reflowing due to the
reduction in number of parameters anyway, I did end up switching things around
so that the parameters look a bit more reasonable.

> > So, does anybody see a reason not to go for the trivial
> > [ patch ]
>
> I'd be happy to rely on the buildfarm's opinion here.

Let's see what it says...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-10-19 18:21:31 Re: [PATCH] test/ssl: rework the sslfiles Makefile target
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-10-19 18:07:17 Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing