| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Peter G <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Subject: | Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age |
| Date: | 2021-10-12 17:46:23 |
| Message-ID: | 202110121746.guls5u4g4lye@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 2021-Oct-12, Pavel Luzanov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > When trying to make a link to the new vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age parameter,
> > > I found the wrong ID for this guc (missed word vacuum).
> > > Please consider this patch for a fix.
> > It is good to be consistent, but the name of the link is not essential, is it?
> > Changing it might break existing outside links.
>
> Not essential, it's true. I haven't seen any rules in the documentation
> on forming links for guc.
>
> But how many external links could have been made since September 30?
> And how many times in the future will people encounter inconsistency
> in constructing a link to this parameter?
>
> It seems to me that it's better to fix it.
Yeah, this one is new as of commit 1e55e7d1755c; ISTM we should just fix it.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La persona que no quería pecar / estaba obligada a sentarse
en duras y empinadas sillas / desprovistas, por cierto
de blandos atenuantes" (Patricio Vogel)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-10-12 18:00:53 | Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age |
| Previous Message | Pavel Luzanov | 2021-10-12 08:29:27 | Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age |