| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Zhihong Zhang <zhihong(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Epoch from age is incorrect |
| Date: | 2021-10-11 21:56:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20211011215612.GE643@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 02:52:59PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Monday, October 11, 2021, Zhihong Zhang <zhihong(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> They are several days apart. Maybe leap years are not counted properly?
>
>
> That is related. Intervals supply integer years, months, and days (for
> example). Given an integer month (or year) value there is no way to accurately
> compute the number of days involved (or any subfield of day) since you lack
> knowledge of which months (years) they are (generally). So extracting an epoch
> from an interval is an inherently unwise thing to do. Having done it,
> comparing its result to a timestamp epoch computation is meaningless. If you
> can do the later then just do it as it will provide the expected answer while
> the interval epoch is inherently problematic.
Yes. Also, this blog has more details:
https://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2020.html#August_3_2020
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-10-11 21:59:31 | Re: Epoch from age is incorrect |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-10-11 21:52:59 | Re: Epoch from age is incorrect |