Re: storing an explicit nonce

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Sasasu <i(at)sasa(dot)su>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: storing an explicit nonce
Date: 2021-10-11 17:09:00
Message-ID: 20211011170900.GC643@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:01:08PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > It is more than just the page format --- it would also be the added
> > code, possible performance impact, and later code maintenance to allow
> > for are a more complex or two different page formats.
>
> Yes, there is more to it than just the page format, I agree. I'm still
> of the mind that it's something we're going to get to eventually, if for
> no other reason than that our current page format is certainly not
> perfect and it'd be pretty awesome if we could make improvements to it
> (independently of TDE or anything else discussed currently).

Yes, 100% agree on that. The good part is that TDE would not be paying
the cost for that. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-10-11 17:10:25 Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-10-11 17:07:38 Re: storing an explicit nonce