Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date: 2021-09-30 23:15:13
Message-ID: 202109302315.65qtfrmgbpzt@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Can you say more about 0001?

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-09-30 23:47:08 Re: 002_types.pl fails on some timezones on windows
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2021-09-30 22:57:59 Re: Parallel Full Hash Join