Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot
Date: 2021-09-30 16:45:34
Message-ID: 20210930164534.GA10007@ahch-to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:14:23AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 5:29 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, I agree. Sorry for missing that.
> >
> > The updated patch looks good to me.
> >
>
> Pushed!
>

This patch is still on "Needs review"!
Should we change it to Committed or is expected something else
about it?

--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-09-30 17:16:22 Re: [BUG] failed assertion in EnsurePortalSnapshotExists()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-09-30 16:12:54 Re: prevent immature WAL streaming