From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays) |
Date: | 2021-09-29 17:49:31 |
Message-ID: | 202109291749.ejyaab7wazx7@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Sep-29, Robert Haas wrote:
> Well, this was my suggestion, because if you don't do this, you get
> drift, which I think looks weird. Like the timestamps will be:
>
> 13:41:05.012456
> 13:41:15.072484
> 13:41:25.149632
>
> ...and it gets further and further off as it goes on.'
Right ... I actually *expect* this drift to occur. Maybe people
generally don't like this, it just seems natural to me. Are there other
opinions on this aspect?
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Nadie está tan esclavizado como el que se cree libre no siéndolo" (Goethe)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-09-29 17:52:46 | Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays) |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-09-29 17:45:30 | Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays) |