From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com |
Cc: | masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Subject: | Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages |
Date: | 2021-09-27 02:40:23 |
Message-ID: | 20210927.114023.1519840069762071193.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Tue, 21 Sep 2021 19:23:22 -0500, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote in
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 02:03:11AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > Another idea is to output "Anonymous shared memory was allocated with
> > huge pages" when it's successfully allocated with huge pages, and to output
> > "Anonymous shared memory was allocated without huge pages"
> > when it's successfully allocated without huge pages. I'm not sure if users
> > may think even this message is noisy, though.
>
> +1
+1. Positive phrase looks better.
> Maybe it could show the page size instead of "with"/without:
> "Shared memory allocated with 4k/1MB/1GB pages."
+1.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-09-27 03:17:37 | Re: decoupling table and index vacuum |
Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2021-09-27 02:38:46 | Re: When is int32 not an int32? |