From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com" <mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, "Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com" <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>, Ryo Matsumura <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: prevent immature WAL streaming |
Date: | 2021-09-25 00:48:48 |
Message-ID: | 202109250048.kbyaczlqdvwy@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Sep-23, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Sep-23, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > However, I notice now that the pg_rewind tests reproducibly fail in
> > branch 14 for reasons I haven't yet understood. It's strange that no
> > other branch fails, even when run quite a few times.
>
> Turns out that this is a real bug (setting EndOfLog seems insufficient).
> I'm looking into it.
I had misdiagnosed it; the real problem is that this was taking action
in standby mode and breaking things after promotion. I took quite a
detour ...
Here's the set for all branches, which I think are really final, in case
somebody wants to play and reproduce their respective problem scenarios.
Nathan already confirmed that his reproducer no longer shows a problem,
and this version shouldn't affect that.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El Maquinismo fue proscrito so pena de cosquilleo hasta la muerte"
(Ijon Tichy en Viajes, Stanislaw Lem)
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Fix-WAL-replay-in-presence-of-an-incomplete-record.patch | text/x-diff | 26.4 KB |
v10-0001-Fix-WAL-replay-in-presence-of-an-incomplete-reco.patch | text/x-diff | 22.1 KB |
v11-0001-Fix-WAL-replay-in-presence-of-an-incomplete-reco.patch | text/x-diff | 21.9 KB |
v12-0001-Fix-WAL-replay-in-presence-of-an-incomplete-reco.patch | text/x-diff | 21.9 KB |
v13-0001-Fix-WAL-replay-in-presence-of-an-incomplete-reco.patch | text/x-diff | 21.7 KB |
v14-0001-Fix-WAL-replay-in-presence-of-an-incomplete-reco.patch | text/x-diff | 26.5 KB |
v96-0001-Fix-WAL-replay-in-presence-of-an-incomplete-reco.patch | text/x-diff | 22.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-09-25 01:17:21 | Re: decoupling table and index vacuum |
Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-09-25 00:33:13 | Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests |