From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |
Date: | 2021-09-16 12:44:35 |
Message-ID: | 202109161244.e4ze4eaaj4b6@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Sep-16, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think the problem here is that with the proposed grammar we won't be
> always able to distinguish names at the gram.y stage. Some post
> parsing analysis is required to attribute the right type to name as is
> done in the patch.
Doesn't it work to stuff them all into RangeVars? Then you don't need
to make the node type a monstrosity, just bail out in parse analysis if
an object spec has more elements in the RV than the object type allows.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-09-16 13:15:43 | Re: EXPLAIN(VERBOSE) to CTE with SEARCH BREADTH FIRST fails |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-09-16 12:36:26 | Re: Logical replication keepalive flood |