| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT |
| Date: | 2021-08-25 05:32:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20210825053219.GA1918372@rfd.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 05:06:54PM -0400, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 08/24/21 16:31, Robert Haas wrote:
> > about adding PGDLLIMPORT, which ought to be totally uncontroversial,
>
> The thing is, I think I have somewhere a list of all the threads on this
> topic that I've read through since the first time I had to come with my own
> hat in hand asking for a PGDLLIMPORT on something, years ago now, and
> I don't think I have ever seen one where it was as uncontroversial
> as you suggest.
The "ought" above is a load-bearing word. Nonetheless, here's a case, also
involving GUCs, where it was uncontroversial:
https://postgr.es/m/flat/20171120200230.iwcmptwznbvl6y4c%40alap3.anarazel.de
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-08-25 05:34:21 | Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-08-25 05:27:54 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |