From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Kincaid <tomjohnkincaid(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce) |
Date: | 2021-08-24 00:29:09 |
Message-ID: | 20210824002909.GA18095@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 04:57:31PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:36 PM Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks Robert for your comments.
> > I have split the patch into two portions. One that handles DB OID and
> > the other that
> > handles tablespace OID and relfilenode OID.
>
> It's pretty clear from the discussion, I think, that the database OID
> one is going to need rework to be considered.
I assume this patch is not going to be applied until there is an actual
use case for preserving these values.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-08-24 00:51:43 | Re: [BUG] wrong refresh when ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ADD/DROP PUBLICATION |
Previous Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2021-08-24 00:03:37 | Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful |