| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commit emails to -committers |
| Date: | 2021-08-23 20:27:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20210823202702.GH17906@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Greetings,
* Daniel Gustafsson (daniel(at)yesql(dot)se) wrote:
> > On 20 Aug 2021, at 15:56, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> >> For that reason I'd lean towards having something just be "PostgreSQL
> >> commits <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>" and not put the name in there at all
> >> -- the name would of course go in the body.
> >
> > That'd be OK with me.
>
> +1, I think that’s the preferrable option.
I'm alright with that, but would want to have the committer somehow
mentioned in the email somewhere or maybe in the subject..? Otherwise
it's entirely unclear who the committer is without going to the actual
git repo and that seems like a general reduction in usability.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-08-23 20:28:18 | Re: Commit emails to -committers |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-08-20 18:20:58 | Re: Commit emails to -committers |