| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, yuzuko <yuzukohosoya(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze) |
| Date: | 2021-08-17 10:50:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20210817105022.e2t4rozkhqy2myhn@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2021-08-16 13:13:55 -0400, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> Another possible problem is that before the revert, we accept
> ALTER TABLE some_partitioned_table SET (autovacuum_enabled=on/off);
> (also autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor and autovacuum_analyze_threshold)
> but after the revert this is will throw a syntax error. What do people
> think we should do about that?
>
> 1. Do nothing. If somebody finds in that situation, they can use
> ALTER TABLE .. RESET ...
> to remove the settings.
>
> 2. Silently accept the option and do nothing.
> 3. Accept the option and throw a warning that it's a no-op.
> 4. Something else
1) seems OK to me.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2021-08-17 10:58:57 | Re: Allow parallel DISTINCT |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-08-17 10:49:50 | Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze) |