Re: Commitfest overflow

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest overflow
Date: 2021-08-03 19:54:11
Message-ID: 20210803195411.GM3639@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 03:42:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > But it's not clear to me whether you're arguing for CFM to assess this,
> > or whether someone else should make this decision?
>
> > IMHO asking the CFM to do this would be a tremendous burden - properly
> > assessing 50+ patches is a lot of work, and probably requires a fairly
> > experienced hacker ...
>
> Yeah. I can recall that once or twice, Andres went through and triaged
> all the open patches, which was tremendously helpful and I'm sure took a
> serious investment of time. That way doesn't scale. But maybe if we
> split the work among half a dozen or so senior hackers, it'd be a
> tolerable amount of work per-person?

Yes, I think we are going to need to do something like this.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-08-03 19:55:05 Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-08-03 19:42:57 Re: Commitfest overflow