| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest overflow |
| Date: | 2021-08-03 18:57:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20210803185749.GK3639@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 08:51:57PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> How would this be different from the CFM just rejecting patches? It does not
> matter if there's an explicit number of patches that we allow to be moved to
> the next CF - someone still needs to make the decision, and I agree with Tom
> it probably should not be CFM's job.
My experience with the query id patch is that it can't be rejected
because everyone wants it, but it needs work to get it in a state that
everyone approves of. Sometimes it is impossible for the patch author
to figure that out, and I needed Álvaro Herrera's help on the query id
patch, so even I wasn't able to figure it out alone.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-08-03 19:14:41 | Re: Release 13 of the PostgreSQL BuildFarm client |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-08-03 18:54:46 | Re: Commitfest overflow |