Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly
Date: 2021-07-29 15:42:16
Message-ID: 20210729154216.GL9600@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:36:19AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>
> I have an issue with the fragment "whether they are from contrib" - my
> understanding at this point is that because of the way we package and
> version contrib it should not be necessary to copy those shared object
> files from the old to the new server (maybe, just maybe, with a
> qualification that you are upgrading between two versions that were in
> support during the same time period).
>
>
> Just to clarify. In no case are binaries copied from the old server to the new
> server. Whether from contrib or otherwise.

Right. Those are _binaries_ and therefore made to match a specific
Postgres binary. They might work or might not, but copying them is
never a good idea --- they should be recompiled to match the new server
binary, even if the extension had no version/API changes.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2021-07-29 15:46:12 Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-07-29 15:40:27 Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly