Re: Another pg_dump using split and gzip for large databases

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: jim(at)jdoherty(dot)net, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Another pg_dump using split and gzip for large databases
Date: 2021-07-29 15:29:25
Message-ID: 20210729152925.GJ9600@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 05:23:20PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 29 Jul 2021, at 16:58, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > OK, I can adjust it to say "GNU split" or just skip this addition.
>
> I don't have strong feelings either way, with a slight preference for writing
> it as "GNU split" since it's still a good tip for a large amount of readers.

Yes, I am on the fence for the same reasons but lean toward moving
forward for your same reasons.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

Attachment Content-Type Size
split.diff text/x-diff 1.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-07-29 17:15:21 Re: Another pg_dump using split and gzip for large databases
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-07-29 15:23:20 Re: Another pg_dump using split and gzip for large databases