| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Removing "long int"-related limit on hash table sizes |
| Date: | 2021-07-26 20:39:23 |
| Message-ID: | 202107262039.il4awjd3v3ww@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Jul-26, Tom Lane wrote:
> ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=) writes:
> > We also have the (U)INT64CONST() macros, which are about about two
> > thirds as common as the U?LL? suffixes.
>
> Yeah. Ideally we'd forbid direct use of the suffixes and insist
> you go through those macros, but I don't know of any way that
> we could enforce such a coding rule, short of grepping the tree
> periodically.
IIRC we have one buildfarm member that warns us about perlcritic; maybe
this is just another setup of that sort.
(Personally I run the perlcritic check in my local commit-verifying
script before pushing.)
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"XML!" Exclaimed C++. "What are you doing here? You're not a programming
language."
"Tell that to the people who use me," said XML.
https://burningbird.net/the-parable-of-the-languages/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-07-26 20:46:13 | Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-07-26 20:28:54 | Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) |