From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |
Date: | 2021-07-22 18:48:32 |
Message-ID: | 202107221848.igsyrgcz6lzb@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
One thing I just happened to notice is this part of your commit message
: REPLICA IDENTITY columns are always replicated
: irrespective of column names specification.
... for which you don't have any tests -- I mean, create a table with a
certain REPLICA IDENTITY and later try to publish a set of columns that
doesn't include all the columns in the replica identity, then verify
that those columns are indeed published.
Having said that, I'm not sure I agree with this design decision; what I
think this is doing is hiding from the user the fact that they are
publishing columns that they don't want to publish. I think as a user I
would rather get an error in that case:
ERROR: invalid column list in published set
DETAIL: The set of published commands does not include all the replica identity columns.
or something like that. Avoid possible nasty surprises of security-
leaking nature.
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"On the other flipper, one wrong move and we're Fatal Exceptions"
(T.U.X.: Term Unit X - http://www.thelinuxreview.com/TUX/)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-07-22 18:48:44 | Re: Followup Timestamp to timestamp with TZ conversion |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-07-22 18:36:10 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |