From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Arne Roland <A(dot)Roland(at)index(dot)de> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables |
Date: | 2021-07-21 22:16:42 |
Message-ID: | 202107212216.kj4i5us2i33k@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
... now, thinking about how does pg_dump deal with this, I think this
thread is all wrong, or at least mostly wrong. We cannot have triggers
in partitions with different names from the triggers in the parents.
pg_dump would only dump the trigger in the parent and totally ignore the
ones in children if they have different names.
So we still need the recursion bits; but
1. if we detect that we're running in a trigger which has tgparentid
set, we have to raise an error,
2. if we are running on a trigger in a partitioned table, then ONLY must
not be specified.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Puedes vivir sólo una vez, pero si lo haces bien, una vez es suficiente"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-07-21 22:21:16 | Re: Using a stock openssl BIO |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2021-07-21 22:12:51 | Re: badly calculated width of emoji in psql |