From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org |
Cc: | jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com, mk(at)071(dot)ovh, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17103: WAL segments are not removed after exceeding max_slot_wal_keep_size |
Date: | 2021-07-20 04:18:20 |
Message-ID: | 20210720.131820.2047672013390321210.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
At Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:24:48 -0400, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote in
> On 2021-Jul-19, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the mistake. It seems to me the cause the above is that
> > segment removal happens *after* invalidation. Since (at least
> > currently) the "slot is invalidated" warning issued only at the time
> > just before WAL-removal, we should expect that old segments are gone
> > after the checkpoint-ending log, which should be seen after
> > WAL-removal. If not, that shows that there's a bug.
> >
> > What do you think about the attached?
>
> Sounds sensible -- I verified the logs for one of the cases that failed
> in the buildfarm, and indeed the "checkpoint ended" message appears
> after the s2 slot is created, so it should fix the problem. (I didn't
> actually try to reproduce the problem locally, so I didn't verify the
> fix any further than ensuring the test still passes.)
>
> Pushed, thanks!
Thaks, and sorry for the series of bugs.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2021-07-20 11:55:58 | Re: IRe: BUG #16792: silent corruption of GIN index resulting in SELECTs returning non-matching rows |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-07-19 23:17:07 | Re: BUG #17113: Assert failed on calling a function fixed after an extension reload |