From: | Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: corruption of WAL page header is never reported |
Date: | 2021-07-19 09:13:37 |
Message-ID: | 20210719181337.be7c974d3bf222329a17a43f@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:47:07 +0900 (JST)
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> At Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:00:39 +0900, Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in
> > Your patch doesn't fix the issue that the error message is never reported in
> > standby mode. When a WAL page header is broken, the standby would silently repeat
> > retrying forever.
>
> Ok, I see your point and agree to that.
>
> > I think we have to let users know the corruption of WAL page header even in
> > standby mode, not? A corruption of WAL record header is always reported,
> > by the way. (See that XLogReadRecord is calling ValidXLogRecordHeader.)
>
> Howeer, I'm still on the opinion that we don't need to check that
> while in standby mode.
>
> How about the attached?
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:50:16 +0900 (JST)
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> me> Howeer, I'm still on the opinion that we don't need to check that
> me> while in standby mode.
>
> Of course it's typo of "while not in standby mode".
Thanks for updating the patch. I agree with you.
I think it is nice to fix to perform the check only during standby mode
because it make a bit clearer why we check it immediately in XLogPageRead.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2021-07-19 09:32:28 | Re: corruption of WAL page header is never reported |
Previous Message | Greg Nancarrow | 2021-07-19 09:10:57 | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |