Re: visibility map corruption

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Floris Van Nee <florisvannee(at)optiver(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: visibility map corruption
Date: 2021-07-08 13:51:47
Message-ID: 20210708135147.GA11707@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 08:11:14AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Also, the pg_upgrade status message still seems to be misplaced:
>
> In 20210706190612(dot)GM22043(at)telsasoft(dot)com, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I re-arranged the pg_upgrade output of that patch: it was in the middle of the
> > two halves: "Setting next transaction ID and epoch for new cluster"
>
> +++ b/src/bin/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade.c
> @@ -473,6 +473,12 @@ copy_xact_xlog_xid(void)
> "\"%s/pg_resetwal\" -f -x %u \"%s\"",
> new_cluster.bindir, old_cluster.controldata.chkpnt_nxtxid,
> new_cluster.pgdata);
> + check_ok();
> + prep_status("Setting oldest XID for new cluster");
> + exec_prog(UTILITY_LOG_FILE, NULL, true, true,
> + "\"%s/pg_resetwal\" -f -u %u \"%s\"",
> + new_cluster.bindir, old_cluster.controldata.chkpnt_oldstxid,
> + new_cluster.pgdata);
> exec_prog(UTILITY_LOG_FILE, NULL, true, true,
> "\"%s/pg_resetwal\" -f -e %u \"%s\"",
> new_cluster.bindir, old_cluster.controldata.chkpnt_nxtepoch,

Wow, you are 100% correct. Updated patch attached.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

Attachment Content-Type Size
oldestxid.diff.gz application/gzip 3.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-07-08 13:57:32 Re: Pipeline mode and PQpipelineSync()
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2021-07-08 13:40:39 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum