From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes |
Date: | 2021-07-02 17:36:47 |
Message-ID: | 20210702173647.GB25522@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 05:15:23AM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:01:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >Only the first mention of "factorial()" uses a link; the second item
> >doesn't have any link.
>
> There are other places as well, like this on:
> "The postgres_fdw supports these type of scans if async_capable is set."
>
> async_capable is not a link. Or this one:
> "This speeds normalize() and IS NORMALIZED."
>
> I still think it should be more consistent and all should be links, even if they point to the same section.
I am using standard typographic style, where the first mention of
something is often italics, but later mentions might not be. I am not
in favor of adding links to everthing that can have a link _unless_
there is a unique URI for each item.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2021-07-02 19:11:15 | docs issue in transactions section |
Previous Message | Euler Taveira | 2021-07-02 14:47:09 | Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes |