Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes
Date: 2021-07-02 01:57:26
Message-ID: 20210702015726.GG3618@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 09:47:47PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 21:35 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I normally link to only the _first_ mention of something, and since they
> are both in the same section, I didn't add a link for the second one.
> Adding a second link might suggest that there is more information
> available, even though the coarseness of our links means that section is
> the same.
>
> Perhaps the wording would be better as something like:
>
> New <a href=“…”>predefined roles</a> for granting access to read/write all
> tables have been added, called pg_read_all_data and pg_write_all_data ..?
>
> Or something along those lines?

I have avoided doing that since the link is about the roles, not about
the term "predefined roles".

> Just a thought.
>
> Perhaps another idea would be to make one link which includes both names.

Uh, that is going to look odd, I am afraid.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2021-07-02 02:01:46 Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2021-07-02 01:47:47 Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes