| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes |
| Date: | 2021-07-01 21:46:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20210701214616.GT20766@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Greetings,
* Euler Taveira (euler(at)eulerto(dot)com) wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021, at 11:47 AM, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> > "Add predefined roles pg_read_all_data and pg_write_all_data (Stephen Frost)
> >
> > These non-login roles can be used to give read or write permission to all tables, views, and sequences."
> >
> > pg_read_all_data links to "Predefined roles", pg_write_all_data does not. Is that on purpose? At least it looks strange.
> It seems so. Once you click on the link, you will notice that pg_write_all_data
> is there too. Role names are similar to make the reader suspect that both
> descriptions will be on the same page.
I tend to agree that it'd make sense to have them both as links.
I've CC'd Bruce to make sure he sees this discussion.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-07-02 01:35:17 | Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira | 2021-07-01 19:48:23 | Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes |