Re: Doc chapter for Hash Indexes

aOn Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:56:51PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 5:12 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 2:31 PM Simon Riggs
> > <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I attach both clean and compare versions.
> > >
> >
> > Do we want to hold this work for PG15 or commit in PG14 and backpatch
> > it till v10 where we have made hash indexes crash-safe? I would vote
> > for committing in PG14 and backpatch it till v10, however, I am fine
> > if we want to commit just to PG14 or PG15.
>
> Backpatch makes sense to me, but since not everyone will be reading
> this thread, I would look towards PG15 only first. We may yet pick up
> additional corrections or additions before a backpatch, if that is
> agreed.

Yeah, I think backpatching makes sense.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.