From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: array_cat anycompatible change is breaking xversion upgrade tests (v14 release notes) |
Date: | 2021-06-09 00:02:46 |
Message-ID: | 20210609000246.GB26035@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 05:56:18PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> @Bruce: Would you add something about this to the release notes before beta2?
>
> I added it as an OpenItem.
OK, see below.
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:14:58AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:35:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:43:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> As was discussed in the thread leading up to that commit, modifying the
> > > >> signature of array_cat and friends could break user-defined operators
> > > >> and aggregates based on those functions. It seems to me that the
> > > >> usability gain from this change is worth that cost, but it is causing
> > > >> an issue for xversion tests.
Uh, this is _using_ these functions in aggregates, or changing the
system functions' argument types, right? I didn't think we supported
dump/restore of modified system tables.
> > >
> > > > But I think this should be called out as an incompatible change in the release
> > > > notes.
> > >
> > > If it was not, yes it should be.
> >
> > @Bruce, I propose:
> >
> > Some system functions are changed to accept "anycompatiblearray" arguments.
> > This causes failures when restoring a database backup or running pg_restore if
> > there were aggregate functions defined using those functions with their
> > original argument types.
> >
> > Such aggregate functions should be dropped before upgrade/restore and then
> > re-created afterwards using the "anycompatible" functions. The affected
> > functions are: array_append, array_prepend, array_cat, array_position,
> > array_positions, array_remove, array_replace, and width_bucket.
I read the entire thread and I see:
pg_restore: error: could not execute query: ERROR: function
array_append(anyarray, anyelement) does not exist
Command was: CREATE AGGREGATE public.array_accum(anyelement) (
SFUNC = array_append,
STYPE = anyarray,
INITCOND = '{}',
PARALLEL = safe
);
This involves creating an aggreate that _uses_ these array functions as
their state transition function?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2021-06-09 00:02:52 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-08 23:58:56 | Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert |