From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic |
Date: | 2021-06-08 16:06:02 |
Message-ID: | 202106081606.2ve4tjdepsge@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Jun-06, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> However, I also found an autovacuum chewing 100% CPU, and it appears the
> problem is actually because autovacuum has locked a page of pg-statistic, and
> every other process then gets stuck waiting in the planner. I checked a few
> and found these:
> [...]
Hmm ... I wonder if this could be related to commits d9d076222f5b,
c98763bf51bf, etc. I don't have any connecting thoughts other than the
tuple visibility code being involved. Do you see any procs with the
PROC_IN_SAFE_IC flag set?
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-06-08 16:26:02 | Re: Race condition in recovery? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-08 16:00:03 | Re: SQL-standard function body |