Re: SQL-standard function body

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Date: 2021-06-08 01:51:34
Message-ID: 20210608015134.ovucdsabm6tppo6n@nol
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 03:24:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Concretely, I think the right fix is per attached.

+1, I agree that this approach is better.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Japin Li 2021-06-08 02:20:21 Re: Confused about extension and shared_preload_libraries
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-06-08 01:29:18 Re: Race condition in recovery?