From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "tom(dot)beacon" <tom(dot)beacon(at)protonmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: possible license violations |
Date: | 2021-06-03 23:00:08 |
Message-ID: | 20210603230008.GB6775@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 06:08:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 09:31:15PM +0000, tom.beacon wrote:
> >> What is the best contact with whom to discuss possible violations of the pgsql
> >> license?
>
> > Uh, good question, and I could not find the answer easily. I would
> > report it to the owners of the Postgres trademark:
>
> > https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/trademarks/
> > board(at)lists(dot)postgres(dot)ca
>
> A point worth making here is that the Postgres *license* is so lax
> that it's basically impossible to violate, unless maybe by redistributing
> the code sans COPYRIGHT file. And even if somebody were doing that,
> I doubt how much we'd care.
I have received private reports of our COPYRIGHT not being properly
included in distributions so I am sensitive to those possible
violations, and I assume the trademark holders would deal with those as
well.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tiffany Thang | 2021-06-04 01:10:04 | Re: Dropping dependent tables |
Previous Message | Bryn Llewellyn | 2021-06-03 22:35:29 | inner subprograms ... Was: syntax question |