| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | rekgrpth(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17035: assert after commit |
| Date: | 2021-05-26 17:40:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20210526174017.GA11909@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2021-May-26, Tom Lane wrote:
> PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > after this commit
> > https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/d18ee6f92d9a22b4fae57f515797b2196bf385c7
> > I got assert
> > TRAP: FailedAssertion("portal != NULL", File: "pquery.c", Line: 1758)
> > in my plugin
> > https://github.com/RekGRpth/pg_task
>
> I'm inclined to think that means you were doing something you
> should not have been doing. But without any details it's
> hard to say.
Hmm, see for example [1] which is doing SPI_prepare_my() [2] and then
SPI_execute_plan_my() ... Does the SPI interface really require that you
create an ActivePortal in the SPI-calling code? This looks a bit
suspicious to me ...
[1] https://github.com/RekGRpth/pg_task/blob/master/work.c#L703
[2] https://github.com/RekGRpth/pg_task/blob/master/spi.c
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-26 17:47:53 | Re: BUG #17035: assert after commit |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2021-05-26 14:54:27 | Re: XX000: unknown type of jsonb container. |