Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
Date: 2021-05-13 19:04:30
Message-ID: 20210513190430.GA22731@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-May-13, Stephen Frost wrote:

> Or just accept that this is a bit hokey with the 'auto' approach. I get
> Bruce has concerns about it but I'm not convinced that it's actually all
> that bad to go with that.

Yeah, I think the alleged confusion there is overstated.

I'm happy to act as committer for that if he wants to step away from it.
I'm already used to being lapidated at every corner anyway.

--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
"E pur si muove" (Galileo Galilei)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-05-13 19:11:59 Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2021-05-13 18:47:23 Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements