| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints |
| Date: | 2021-05-11 17:35:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20210511173542.ur7dm2yheduhgzdb@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2021-05-10 09:46:02 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> No worries - I knew that I'd have to do this at some point, even though
> I hadn't planned to do that today... I should have all of them green
> before end of today.
>
> I found that I actually can build LLVM 3.9 directly, as clang-6 can
> still build it directly (wheras the oldest gcc still installed can't
> build it directly). So it's a bit less painful than I thought at first
>
> The 3.9 instances (phycodurus, dragonet) tests are running right now,
> and I'm fairly sure they'll pass (most of a --noreport --nostatus run
> passed). Going forward building LLVM 4,5,6 now - the later versions take
> longer...
Looks like it's all clear now. All but the results for 11 had cleared up
until yesterday evening, and the rest came in ok over night.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-05-11 18:23:08 | Re: Performance degradation of REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2021-05-11 17:35:23 | Re: Performance degradation of REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW |