From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |
Date: | 2021-05-11 15:37:02 |
Message-ID: | 20210511153702.GU6088@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:26:48AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 5/11/21 11:11 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Previously existence of such columns were ignored when caller had table
> > > level privileges.
> >
> > I can't reproduce the NULL using column name text:
>
> > test=> SELECT has_column_privilege('test', 'z', 'SELECT');
> > ERROR: column "z" of relation "test" does not exist
>
> That is the way it is supposed to work when the column is specified by name.
> The patch did not change that in any way.
I am just confused why attribute numbers are handled differently than
attribute names.
> > but I was able to show it using attribute numbers, as you explained:
>
> Yes, that was what the patch fixed.
Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-05-11 15:44:22 | Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes? |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2021-05-11 15:26:48 | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |