Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD
Date: 2021-05-09 21:17:50
Message-ID: 20210509211750.oavevzhghzm77och@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2021-05-09 17:12:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> (I wonder if we shouldn't adjust the comments in pg_config_manual.h,
> though, as they certainly leave the impression that USE_VALGRIND
> isn't essential.)

That'd make sense to me. If we found a better way to deal with the
sinval thing it'd be good too - but I am not seeing anything convincing,
and I looked a couple times over the years...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-05-09 22:17:36 Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-05-09 21:12:14 Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD