Re: Some oversights in query_id calculation

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some oversights in query_id calculation
Date: 2021-05-05 00:33:36
Message-ID: 20210505003336.oyudm7t47mgaljm7@nol
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 02:59:42PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 12:27:37PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > Hi Aleksander,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 03:22:39PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> > > Hi Julien,
> > >
> > > > You should see failures doing a check-world or simply a make -C
> > > > contrib/pg_stat_statements check
> > >
> > > Sorry, my bad. I was running make check-world, but did it with -j4 flag
> > > which was a mistake.
> > >
> > > The patch is OK.
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing!
>
> Patch applied, thanks.

Thanks a lot Bruce!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-05-05 00:40:36 Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs
Previous Message Peter Smith 2021-05-05 00:15:58 Re: AlterSubscription_refresh "wrconn" wrong variable?