Re: Remove redundant variable from transformCreateStmt

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove redundant variable from transformCreateStmt
Date: 2021-04-29 18:39:42
Message-ID: 20210429183942.GA10172@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Apr-29, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> > I'd do it like this. Note I removed an if/else block in addition to
> > your changes.
>
> > I couldn't convince myself that this is worth pushing though; either we
> > push it to all branches (which seems unwarranted) or we create
> > back-patching hazards.
>
> Yeah ... an advantage of the if/else coding is that it'd likely be
> simple to extend to cover additional statement types, should we ever
> wish to do that. The rendering you have here is nice and compact,
> but it would not scale up well.

That makes sense. But that part is not in Amul's patch -- he was only
on about removing the is_foreign_table Boolean. If I remove the if/else
block change, does the rest of the patch looks something we'd want to
have? I kinda agree that the redundant variable is "ugly". Is it worth
removing? My hunch is no.

--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-04-29 19:05:31 Re: Patch to allow pg_filedump to support reading of pg_filenode.map
Previous Message Richard Yen 2021-04-29 18:22:05 Re: Patch to allow pg_filedump to support reading of pg_filenode.map