Re: BUG #16939: Plural interval for negative singular

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 04:10:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:13:29PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 01:06:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 01:02:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:45:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > >> I agree with Noah's opinion that we should stick to the historical
> > > > >> behavior in the interval I/O functions. There is not enough solidity
> > > > >> in the "this is grammatically wrong" argument to justify taking any
> > > > >> risk of application breakage, and it seems like there is some risk of
> > > > >> that there.
> > > >
> > > > > Are you saying we should revert the patch and leave the plurals
> > > > > inconsistent in different places? We were already expressing -1 as
> > > > > singular in most of the places I saw.
> >
> > Which places did you find? I used the following to check for code like you
> > were adding, but it probably missed things:
> >
> > $ git grep '"s"' 5da9868^ | grep abs
> > 5da9868^:src/backend/utils/adt/datetime.c: (abs(sec) != 1 || fsec != 0) ? "s" : "");
> > 5da9868^:src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/interval.c: (abs(sec) != 1 || fsec != 0) ? "s" : "");
>
> Yes, I found the same like you did. Are you saying we should remove the
> abs() calls here so we are consistent?

No, I advise just reverting 5da9868. The output funcs should keep doing what
they did in v13, inconsistency and all.

I was asking the above question to see which of singular or plural was more
common before $SUBJECT's commit. I count two examples of singular and seven
examples of plural (one in EVALUATE_MESSAGE_PLURAL(), six modified in commit
5da9868). Given that, ...

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 01:06:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Well, we should then add a comment that this is inconsistent but should
> not be changed.

... adding comments to the two places that use abs() to achieve singular "-1"
sounds fine.