Re: INCLUDING COMPRESSION (sort enum fields)

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: INCLUDING COMPRESSION (sort enum fields)
Date: 2021-04-22 23:51:23
Message-ID: 20210422235123.GH7256@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

(moved to -hackers)

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/54d30e66-dbd6-5485-aaf6-a291ed55919d%40oss.nttdata.com

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:24:07PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2021/04/15 11:54, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > May I ask at the same time why gram.y (TableLikeOption) and
> > parsenodes.h (CREATE_TABLE_LIKE_COMPRESSION) don't classify this new
> > option in alphabetical order with the rest? Ordering them makes
> > easier a review of them.
>
> I'm not sure why. But +1 to make them in alphabetical order.
> Patch attached.

+1 to your patch

--
Justin

Attachment Content-Type Size
including_compression_order.patch text/x-diff 1.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2021-04-23 07:40:04 Re: Rounding strategy
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-04-22 17:50:20 Re: Rounding strategy

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiro Ikeda 2021-04-23 00:26:17 Re: wal stats questions
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2021-04-22 23:28:12 Re: pg_amcheck contrib application