Re: track_planning causing performance regression

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tharakan, Robins" <tharar(at)amazon(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: track_planning causing performance regression
Date: 2021-04-21 15:40:07
Message-ID: 20210421154007.GU7256@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:13:17AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2021/04/21 23:53, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Or:
> >
> > Enabling this parameter may incur a noticeable performance penalty,
> > especially similar queries are executed by many concurrent connections
> > and compete to update a small number of pg_stat_statements entries.
>
> I prefer this. But what about using "identical" instead of "similar"
> because pg_stat_statements docs already uses "identical" in some places?

I also missed "when", again...

> > Enabling this parameter may incur a noticeable performance penalty,
> > especially when queries with identical structure are executed by many concurrent connections
> > which compete to update a small number of pg_stat_statements entries.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Keller 2021-04-21 16:01:04 Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google)
Previous Message Ian Zagorskikh 2021-04-21 15:35:18 Re: libpq compression