Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance

From: Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Date: 2021-04-20 00:51:34
Message-ID: 20210420095134.8463a06e517f207886e33028@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:40:31 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > This patch (v22c) just crashed for me with an assertion failure on
> > Fedora 31. Here's the stack trace:
>
> > #2  0x000000000094a54a in ExceptionalCondition
> > (conditionName=conditionName(at)entry=0xa91dae "queryDesc->sourceText !=
> > NULL", errorType=errorType(at)entry=0x99b468 "FailedAssertion",
> > fileName=fileName(at)entry=0xa91468
> > "/home/andrew/pgl/pg_head/src/backend/executor/execMain.c",
> > lineNumber=lineNumber(at)entry=199) at
> > /home/andrew/pgl/pg_head/src/backend/utils/error/assert.c:69
>
> That assert just got added a few days ago, so that's why the patch
> seemed OK before.

Thank you for letting me know. I'll fix it.

--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Coleman 2021-04-20 00:56:19 Re: "could not find pathkey item to sort" for TPC-DS queries 94-96
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-04-20 00:44:31 Re: when the startup process doesn't