Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
Date: 2021-04-17 09:24:43
Message-ID: 20210417092443.l7kr25vgsiqucnoc@nol
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:24:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 10:47 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Although there are only a few buildfarm members complaining, I don't
> >> really want to leave them red all weekend. I could either commit the
> >> patch I just presented, or revert ef387bed8 ... got a preference?
>
> > +1 for committing the new patch for now. I will look into to the
> > record problem. More in a couple of days.
>
> OK, done.

Thanks for the fixes! I'll also look at the problem.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Esteban Zimanyi 2021-04-17 11:12:24 Re: Error when defining a set returning function
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-04-17 09:23:09 Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies