Re: Converting built-in SQL functions to new style

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Converting built-in SQL functions to new style
Date: 2021-04-16 02:07:38
Message-ID: 20210416020738.GD3315@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 07:25:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> One thing I was wondering about, but did not pull the trigger on
> here, is whether to split off the function-related stuff in
> system_views.sql into a new file "system_functions.sql"

+1

--
Justin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhihong Yu 2021-04-16 02:27:17 Re: "could not find pathkey item to sort" for TPC-DS queries 94-96
Previous Message Japin Li 2021-04-16 02:02:25 Re: Truncate in synchronous logical replication failed